Review: The Woman In Black
PUBLISHED: 08:41 14 February 2012
The fourth feature from the reborn Hammer House of Horror stable is a bid to match the tension and shocks that made the Paranormal Activity films so successful.
This being a British horror film it can’t just scare people, it has to be a costume drama and an adaptation of a book and stage play.
It’s a good enough little chiller but does seem like a lot of effort to produce a few shocks.
In the case of the lead character, Arthur Kips (Daniel Radcliffe), it’s a single costume drama. Radcliffe spends the film in the one outfit – collarless shirt, waistcoat, pocketwatch – and with the same expression.
No matter the situation his bemused agitation doesn’t waver.
Radcliffe is a likeable performer, with a sincerity about him which is endearing. But he is rather boyish to be playing a widower with a young son.
As a lawyer sent to a remote village in the late 18th century to deal with the estate of a deceased client, who finds himself ostracised by locals and terrified by the ghostly apparitions he encounters in the empty house, he resembles a boy sent to do a man’s job.
Because there’s no development in his performance the suspense doesn’t build up, it just hovers at the same level throughout. Which is not to say it doesn’t make you jump but the effect is largely mechanical.
Indeed, the first big shock is mostly achieved by a large bang on the soundtrack. James Watkin previously directed the repellent Deliverance-with-Chavs shocker, Eden Lake.
It was a horrendous experience but it did stay with you.
The unease generated by Woman in Black has dissipated before the end of the closing credits.
THE WOMAN IN BLACK (12A)
Director: James Watkin
Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Ciaran Hinds, Janet McTeer, Liz White, Shaun Dooley and Roger Allam
Length: 95 mins