Work begins to fell Golden Triangle tree that was saved by campaigners
- Credit: Kate Weaver
Work to fell a tree which has stood proudly in a city cul-de-sac for more than a century has started - despite pleas from neighbours to preserve it.
In 1998, campaigners scaled a tree on Paxton Place, off Newmarket Road in Norwich in a successful bid to save it from the chop.
Now though, 22 years later, tree surgeons have begun work to remove it - despite the same neighbours repeating their calls for it to be saved.
The beech tree, which is more than 120 years old, was first earmarked for felling in 1998 when homebuilders were seeking to remove it in favour of seven new homes.
However, a tree-top protest saw the tree saved and a temporary preservation order on it.
You may also want to watch:
With work now under way though, protesters have called on Norwich City Council to do more to try and save it - calling for it to be given “a stay of execution”.
Graham Weaver, 83, of Newmarket Road, who co-ordinated the protests, said: “One of the council’s tree officers has looked at it and said it looked diseased, but to us it looks beautiful and vigorous.
- 1 Alan Carr enjoys 'delicious food' and leaves large tip at city restaurant
- 2 Tributes paid to 'amazing' Norwich shop worker
- 3 Motorcyclist injured after crash on Norwich road
- 4 Egg-lobbing mob leads police to step up presence in suburb
- 5 All the fish and chip shops in Norwich with 5-star hygiene ratings
- 6 7 of the best places to see fireworks in and around Norwich in 2021
- 7 Schoolchildren still without playing field after TWO YEARS
- 8 See how Norwich Castle's keep is being transformed
- 9 'They can't get away with it': Petrol boss defiant after spate of crimes
- 10 'I don't feel safe' - Boss' fears just one month into shop job
“What does not seem right to me is that there has been no second opinion sought on the health of the tree.”
However, a spokesman for the city council said that there is evidence that the tree has suffered significant decay, which has compromised its structural safety - which the council carried out using a visual tree assessment - which seeks visual signs of decay and defects.
The spokesman added that the tree is privately-owned, with the owner having ordered the works. With the tree no longer covered by a tree protection order, planning permission was not required for this work to be done.
Despite this, Mr Weaver feels that the council should have made a more concerted effort to protect the tree - particularly through exploring further assessments of the tree’s health. He said he plans to raise the issue with the Local Government Ombudsman.
Kate Weaver, his wife, said: “The loss of a tree is always a sad business - but just now, when there is so much else to be sad about, it feels terrible.”