Nut allergy fears spark battle for 'landmark' walnut tree
- Credit: Denise Bradley
A council is seeking to protect a walnut tree despite a mother claiming it poses a danger to her daughter who has a serious nut allergy.
Chantal Beck, 40, fears the 17m tree in a neighbour’s garden poses a health risk to six-year-old Beau because walnuts drop from overhanging branches into her small garden in Trowse.
The mum-of-two has asked to be able to reduce the height and spread of the 100-year-old tree after her daughter suffered a serious allergic reaction after playing in the garden in 2019.
“It didn't occur to me that she might have a reaction because she couldn't crack a walnut open so was unlikely to eat one,” she said.
“But they mulch and through play it gets on her fingers and hands and then on her face and before you know it it’s in her system.
You may also want to watch:
“She had swollen ears, swollen lips and was clutching her throat. Then she had hives on her body. The reaction isn’t just itchy skin, it is anaphylactic.”
Ms Beck was given now lapsed permission in 2018 to reduce the size of the tree by four metres, but has applied again following medical advice to reduce her daughter’s exposure to walnuts.
- 1 Alan Carr enjoys 'delicious food' and leaves large tip at city restaurant
- 2 'Disaster from start to finish': Parents slam school for failing kids
- 3 See how Norwich Castle's keep is being transformed
- 4 'I don't feel safe' - Boss' fears just one month into shop job
- 5 Tributes paid to 'amazing' Norwich shop worker
- 6 Schoolchildren still without playing field after TWO YEARS
- 7 Family piano shop founded in 1887 is leaving the city
- 8 What might happen to former Debenhams store in city centre?
- 9 All the fish and chip shops in Norwich with 5-star hygiene ratings
- 10 'They don't add up' - Mixed reaction to city development plans
However South Norfolk Council said new proposals to reduce the tree’s height and spread were unacceptable as they would be “beyond the normal parameters of work for a healthy tree”.
In a letter, conservation and tree officer Imogen Mole said: “The extent of the work will cause ongoing problems with a tree of this age and species and is likely to lead to disease and decay.”
She added “some pruning work would be acceptable” but that due to the “strong feeling and response we have received” the council was now seeking a tree preservation order.
Eleven people have objected to cutting back the tree, although 17 people have backed Ms Beck’s application.
One objector states: “As an artist I draw and photograph it regularly, loving the age and dignity of its perfectly shaped crown.
“Precisely because of its size it is visible from various parts of the village so that it contributes to the rural character of Trowse and can be enjoyed by many of the village residents.”
Another described the tree as a “landmark”, adding: “It is the only large walnut tree in the village and many of us enjoy the walnut harvest in the late summer. The walnuts themselves are especially large.”
However, one person supporting the plans stated: “Although it will be upsetting from a visual perspective for some local residents, when you consider the very dangerous health implications this could have on a small child, I can’t see how anyone can object to this.”
Ms Beck said the dangers posed by downed nuts meant her daughter had become fearful of playing out in the garden with her five-year-old sister Bonnie.
“I do everything I can to collect the walnuts but with the best will in the world I cannot be sure to collect every single one,” she said.
“It’s a lovely tree, about 100 years old, it’s in a conservation area and I don’t dispute that it is a wonderful part of nature.
“Unfortunately I have a daughter who is allergic to walnuts and it covers our garden every year with walnuts.
“I don’t want it to be felled. I’d just like it reduced so I can manage the risk.”
Lisa Neal, councillor for Trowse, said: “There has been no firm decision made yet. I have been in contact with Chantal to see if we can find a compromise to help both sides.
“On one side you have Chantal’s daughter with the health implications, on the other people feel it is a lovely tree and don’t want to have too much cut off it because that could damage or kill the tree. It is a hard one.”