Professor wins court case against parking firm after legal blunder
Amanda Hopkinson was taken to court by NPE for not paying a charge at Earlham House shopping centre in Norwich. Picture: Antony Kelly/Kurt Kaindl - Credit: Antony Kelly/Kurt Kaindl
A judge threw out an attempt by an enforcement company to make a motorist pay £100 for parking at a shopping centre, after its solicitors bungled the court case.
The terms and conditions of parking at Earlham House on Earlham Road in Norwich. Picture: Neil Didsbury - Credit: Archant
National Parking Enforcement (NPE) took Amanda Hopkinson, of Earlham Road, to Norwich County Court on Thursday after she refused to pay a £100 charge for stopping at Earlham House.
The Norwich shopping centre has been at the centre of parking controversy for years and NPE has taken dozens of motorists to court, who refused to pay charges.
But Judge Nicholas Reeves dismissed the claim by NPE against Prof Hopkinson, a former UEA lecturer, after it emerged that its solicitors, Gladstones, had filed the evidence against her too late. Judge Reeves said this was a “clear breach” of court rules.
It only emerged around 30 minutes into the hearing that Gladstones had fallen foul of a court order.
Professor Hopkinson's Mercedes (left) was parked in what she thought was a marked bay at Earlham House in October 2017. Photo: NPE - Credit: Archant
Before the case was dismissed, Gladstone’s solicitor George Mullen had attempted to adjourn the hearing, claiming he had not seen Prof Hopkinson’s witness statement and evidence.
However Prof Hopkinson had sent the court her documents eight months ago in January.
See also: Ex-police officer wins parking court case
Amanda Hopkinson who was taken to court by NPE for not paying a parking charge at Earlham House, Norwich. Photo: Kurt Kaindl - Credit: Archant
The honorary professor of literary translation at City University, London, parked her Mercedes A Class at Earlham House in October 2017.
Most Read
- 1 Two neighbouring properties go up for sale - and they both need some TLC
- 2 All you need to know ahead of the Lord Mayor's Celebration 2022
- 3 Buses damaged in city centre collision
- 4 Road closures revealed for Lord Mayor's Celebration
- 5 Blaze sees 20 passengers evacuated from city bus
- 6 New pub landlord welcomes back families and introduces street food menu
- 7 Vehicles worth £50k stolen from Royal Norfolk Show
- 8 Mobility scooter trashed by hazardous wheelie bins
- 9 Can you spot yourself in the Lord Mayor's Procession crowd?
- 10 Fine dining Indian restaurant named best in region at awards
NPE said she was not parked in a marked bay and argued that this was a breach.
But Prof Hopkinson refused to pay the charge as she said the bay markings were not clear.
Earlham House shopping centre. Picture : ANTONY KELLY - Credit: copyright ARCHANT 2017
On one side there was a white line and on the other side of her vehicle the ground was covered in autumn leaves and dirt, she said.
The grandmother also argued that NPE signs were not in place on the day she parked near the post office to send a present to her grandchildren.
But in a witness statement to the court Julie Le Caille, director of NPE, said: “The signage at the site is clearly visible and the information on the signage informs the driver of the parking conditions at the location.”
Speaking after the case, Prof Hopkinson said: “I feel very relieved. This has been going on for almost three years and it has been horrendous.”
Motorists have repeatedly hit out at NPE over parking charges at Earlham House, as well as the appeals process used by the industry.
