Reader Letter: As 45pc of care homes rated “inadequate” we need to stand up for better care for the elderly
Picture: Thinkstock Photos - Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto
Two reports have been released in the last few days which confirm grave concern about the plight of older people.
Firstly, Care Quality Commission figures indicate that of the 448 care homes recently inspected, 45pc have been rated as 'inadequate' or 'requires improvement'.
These homes fail to meet adequate standards of being safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led.
They are mainly businesses which have to make a profit to survive in a system introduced in the 1990s known as the 'purchaser/provider split'.
We are entitled to ask why commissioners are purchasing with our money services which are inadequate or requiring improvement.
The second issue is raised by the Alzheimer's Society whose research shows that only two (yes, two) per cent of people affected by dementia say homecare workers have enough dementia training, 38pc have no training at all and a huge 71pc have not received any accredited training.
It needs very little imagination to see the distress, indignity and danger caused by these dreadful circumstances. It is not the fault of the vast majority of caring staff who work in what is now called an 'industry' but of failed political doctrines.
Most Read
- 1 Two neighbouring properties go up for sale - and they both need some TLC
- 2 Vehicles worth £50k stolen from Royal Norfolk Show
- 3 Most desirable places to live in Norwich according to estate agents
- 4 Road closures revealed for Lord Mayor's Celebration
- 5 All you need to know ahead of the Lord Mayor's Celebration 2022
- 6 Street food restaurant launches unlimited wings night
- 7 Fine dining Indian restaurant named best in region at awards
- 8 'You owe us!': Furious holidaymakers demand compo
- 9 Primary school left without governors after mass walkout
- 10 Sign of the times: After 187 years jeweller Winsor Bishop changes name
Specifically competition, far from driving up standards has resulted in a race to the bottom. Secondly, inspection alone, which in the case of the CQC costs around £120m every year, has failed to improve standards or avoid tragedies.
I am ashamed to be writing this as a citizen of the country with the fourth highest average personal wealth, not just of Europe, but of the world.
We are all rightly encouraged to plan for our later life. It seems we have only three reasonable options:
1) be extremely wealthy
2) avoid older age altogether
3) demand and fight for decent, publicly accountable services for all the more vulnerable people in our society.
I choose option three.
James Porter, Mill Road, Blofield Heath
Do we need to do more for the elderly? Let us know in the comments.
