Reader Letter: As 45pc of care homes rated “inadequate” we need to stand up for better care for the elderly
- Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto
Two reports have been released in the last few days which confirm grave concern about the plight of older people.
Firstly, Care Quality Commission figures indicate that of the 448 care homes recently inspected, 45pc have been rated as 'inadequate' or 'requires improvement'.
These homes fail to meet adequate standards of being safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led.
They are mainly businesses which have to make a profit to survive in a system introduced in the 1990s known as the 'purchaser/provider split'.
We are entitled to ask why commissioners are purchasing with our money services which are inadequate or requiring improvement.
You may also want to watch:
The second issue is raised by the Alzheimer's Society whose research shows that only two (yes, two) per cent of people affected by dementia say homecare workers have enough dementia training, 38pc have no training at all and a huge 71pc have not received any accredited training.
It needs very little imagination to see the distress, indignity and danger caused by these dreadful circumstances. It is not the fault of the vast majority of caring staff who work in what is now called an 'industry' but of failed political doctrines.
- 1 'Our lives are being destroyed': Neighbours' despair over noisy students
- 2 Pupil taken to hospital after incident at Thorpe St Andrew school
- 3 Norwich named UK's most romantic destination
- 4 'The final straw' - Bakery fears closure over council plans
- 5 City staff facing 'mass burnout' but what is behind the extreme exhaustion?
- 6 Man found dead at Thorpe St Andrew home
- 7 Petrol attack shopkeeper opens spice shop and restaurant in former pub
- 8 Fresh plans for rooftop bar on St Stephens
- 9 Women to boycott city nightclubs amid rise in drink spiking
- 10 Changes in gambling habits see city bookies shutting up shop
Specifically competition, far from driving up standards has resulted in a race to the bottom. Secondly, inspection alone, which in the case of the CQC costs around £120m every year, has failed to improve standards or avoid tragedies.
I am ashamed to be writing this as a citizen of the country with the fourth highest average personal wealth, not just of Europe, but of the world.
We are all rightly encouraged to plan for our later life. It seems we have only three reasonable options:
1) be extremely wealthy
2) avoid older age altogether
3) demand and fight for decent, publicly accountable services for all the more vulnerable people in our society.
I choose option three.
James Porter, Mill Road, Blofield Heath
Do we need to do more for the elderly? Let us know in the comments.