Planning fight over Norwich Elm Hill
David BaleThe owner of a Norwich property claimed today the city council refused him planning permission for a change of use to the ground floor - because they say a restored 16th century oak panelled Tudor room should be a shop, even though it had not been one since 2005.David Bale
The owner of a Norwich property claimed today the city council refused him planning permission for a change of use to the ground floor - because they say a restored 16th century oak panelled Tudor room should be a shop, even though it had not been one since 2005.
Peter Bentley, who owns the former Contemporary Art Gallery in historic Elm Hill, has appealed against the city council's refusal to grant him planning permission for a change of use of the ground floor from retail to residential.
He said: 'We have undertaken to retain the shop windows and continued to display local artists' work in the windows, as we have done since 2005. The house is also open to the public during Heritage Open Days and we feel it contributes greatly to the vitality of the street.'
The council sold the property in 1996 at which time it was empty and in a very poor state of repair.
You may also want to watch:
The building has been stabilised and the interior restored to when it was a merchant's house, he said.
'It seems the council has misunderstood that and have turned down the application, because they want to keep it as a shop. We therefore feel we are justified in asking the council to reconsider its decision through an appeal,' he added.
- 1 Up and coming Norwich musician reaches number 13 in UK charts
- 2 Norwich hairdresser, former boxer and bodybuilder, dies from Covid
- 3 The secrets and scandals of a former Norwich hotel
- 4 Drink driver arrested after crashing into two trees in Norwich
- 5 Norwich Debenhams looks doomed as Boohoo to buy brand
- 6 'A little bit of hope' - Care home manager look back on last 10 months
- 7 Drink-driver caught on flyover after police spot 'worrying' driving
- 8 Can you rehome this Terrier who has spent nine years at animal sanctuary?
- 9 Centre takes action after IT failure causes long queues for Covid jab
- 10 Cycling trail among ideas for new country park
The application was originally refused because the council said the loss of a retail premises at the site would have a detrimental impact on Elm Hill as a special shopping area and its attraction as a tourist destination.
A council spokeswoman said today: 'The council is considering its position and members of the public have until March 8 to put forward their comments or submissions to the planning inspectorate.'
Are you in dispute with the city council over a planning application? Ruing reporter David Bale on 01603 772427 or email firstname.lastname@example.org.