Controversy over Towns Fund giving £25m to Norwich branded as ‘unfortunate’, by city council
- Credit: Archant
Criticism of a £3.6bn fund which awarded Norwich a £25m sum for regeneration as having “political bias” has been blasted by a city councillor as “unfortunate”.
The government’s multi-billion Towns Fund awarded Norwich the money to create a digital hub and technology factory, to revamp the city’s historic halls and prompt investment in East Anglia.
But the scheme, which also sees Great Yarmouth, King’s Lynn and Lowestoft in the running for cash, has been labelled “politically motivated in a scathing report by the House of Commons’ cross-party public accounts committee.
The committee said a lack of transparency “fuelled accusations of political bias in the selection process” of the scheme.
And speaking during a meeting of the city council, held on Wednesday, November 11, Liberal Democrat group leader James Wright described the scheme which predated the Covid-19 crisis, as “a tremendous success for the council”.
You may also want to watch:
He said: “There’s clearly been a lot of hard work that’s gone in.
“I say that because I think it’s slightly unfortunate that there’s press stories today talking about the public accounts committee’s view on that political bias that’s gone into awarding this money.
- 1 Norwich takeaway's food poisoning complaint investigation closed
- 2 Farke makes a pact with City squad
- 3 Tenants battled 'extreme mould' for months
- 4 Woman cut from car after crash on A11
- 5 City star Buendia reveals Messi's Argentina intervention
- 6 Drivers delivering for Amazon have hundreds of pounds of pay withheld
- 7 New Turkish takeaway which cooks over coals shows how kebabs should be done
- 8 Former Norwich North MP and champion of city Dr Ian Gibson dies
- 9 Tributes paid to popular Avenue Middle School head who taught thousands of Norwich children
- 10 Pub relying on British public's resolve ahead of reopening outside space
“I think it’s very important to say that Norwich has received this funding on the merits of the application that it’s put in and the hard work that’s gone in.
“It isn’t, as the committee have suggested, certainly in our case, on the back of some sort of political bias.”
City council leader Alan Waters said: “That’s a very valuable point.”
He added: “For the purposes of seeking the money we were not unhappy that it is a towns fund - although in reality in the case of Norwich it is a city fund.”
Last year, 101 towns were invited to bid for up to £25m for economic and productivity growth but following the general election last year there were accusations from the Labour Party that the government had prioritised marginal electoral seats over areas where the cash was needed.
Shadow communities secretary Steve Reed said there were “now serious concerns ministers may have allocated funding for political gain at the 2019 election”.
But a government spokesman said more affluent towns were ruled out and the most deprived favoured, adding: “We are confident the process we took was comprehensive, robust and fair.”