Gypsy family given green light to stay on site near Norwich Airport by council
- Credit: Archant
The Hellesdon home of a family of travellers has been safeguarded by councillors, who opted against recommendations to evict them.
Council officers had proposed enforcement action by taken against Thomas Bibby and his family, who live in a caravan pitched on a Gypsy site off Holt Road, close to Norwich Airport.
The recommended action proposed councillors give Mr Bibby and his family 18 months to vacate the site.
However, members of the committee instead voted to allow the Romany Gypsy family to remain on the site - providing a range of conditions are met, including a guarantee that just Mr Bibby and his immediate family live there.
This also extended to ensuring that should the family ever vacate the site, it could no longer be used for this purpose.
You may also want to watch:
The conditions also include ensuring no more than two caravans occupy the site at any one time and a hedge be planted in front of a fence the family had put up
Speaking at the meeting, Mr Bibby questioned suggestions in the officer's report that horses kept on the site had escaped from the site and onto airport land.
- 1 'Our lives are being destroyed': Neighbours' despair over noisy students
- 2 Pupil taken to hospital after incident at Thorpe St Andrew school
- 3 'The final straw' - Bakery fears closure over council plans
- 4 Man found dead at Thorpe St Andrew home
- 5 'Dream come true': Norwich restaurant wins national award
- 6 Diversions in place on A47 near Norwich due to flooding
- 7 Norwich man wanted by police
- 8 Mum's pleas to move house denied despite GP's concerns over wellbeing
- 9 Norwich man convicted of murder boasts of mutilating 'up to 30' cats
- 10 See inside this quirky bungalow for sale near Norwich railway station
However, Robert Webb, the case officer who prepared the report, told the committee this was 'not a planning matter' - despite it appearing in his report.
Mr Webb also said in his report that concerns had been raised by the airport that litter from the site could blow onto the airfield - however, he noted Mr Bibby had made conscious effort to clear the field on the day of the meeting.
During debate, several members made it clear they would be opposed to taking the full enforcement and it was instead moved to 'under enforce', allowing the family to stay under conditions.
Committee member Mike Sands said: 'Mr Bibby would not want animals escaping, particularly not into the airport, as he would be only too aware of the consequences should that happen.
'I think under enforcement is fine.'
Fellow member Ian Stutely also said he felt the conditions were 'the sensible option'.
Hugo Malik added: 'I believe the European Convention on Human Rights trumps any planning regulation.'