Heigham Park campaigners' survey shows 82pc against hard tennis courts
- Credit: George Thompson
Campaigners calling for construction of tennis courts in a Norwich park to be halted so consultation can take place say their own survey shows 82pc of people are against the scheme.
Norwich City Council is due to begin work to replace 10 grass tennis courts in Heigham Park with three floodlit, all-weather, hard surface ones.
The council says there was consultation as part of the planning process, when 120 objected to the plans, which were agreed in 2018.
The council says there were also discussions with groups and organisations.
But campaigners say that was not pre-application consultation with residents and have been calling for the council to ask people what they want..
You may also want to watch:
Campaigners known as the Heigham Park Consultation Group have conducted their own survey - sending out 3,000 leaflets.
They say 212 people have responded so far, with 82pc against the plans and 85pc wanting consultation.
- 1 Police swoop on Norwich address
- 2 Two men in critical condition as multiple people stabbed
- 3 Norwich cat torturer who murdered pensioner ‘planned to carry on killing’
- 4 Community in shock as murder investigation launched
- 5 Asda and Amazon urgently recall items due to safety concerns
- 6 Suburb's shock after mugging attempt leaves teen laying on path
- 7 Charity boss in battle with driver who keeps nicking loading space
- 8 Speed signs to FINALLY be installed at 'accident hotspot'
- 9 Norwich man crowned Britain's Best Young Chef
- 10 New pop-up dried flower store opens in Norwich
And 76pc would prefer the area to remain some kind of green space, accessible by all park users.
Members of the group also surveyed existing tennis courts in Eaton Park, comparing the council's booking system information with actual use of the courts.
They said their survey found that at what they defined as "peak times", when at least five of the seven courts had been booked, they were fully occupied on just six occasions.
They said that indicated a high level of no-shows, and called into question the council's argument that the Heigham Park courts were needed.
Anthony Mullen, from the Heigham Park Consultation Group, said the point of the survey was to make the case for "proper consultation, with the right people".
He said: "If you took our survey as an indicator of what people actually want it's perfect irony that by unlocking the gates, mowing some paths into the meadow that's taken over the old courts, scattering a few benches and tables about, many more people would be happier with that as an outcome than a set of floodlit all-weather tennis courts."
A Norwich City Council spokesperson said the council's position had not changed and said: "From the very beginning, this project has been about improving facilities for our residents and investing in our historic and much-loved parks. It is also an important part of delivering our priority to improve health and wellbeing – more important now than ever.
"During the process we have listened to and considered, the views of community groups.
“The importance of delivering this sporting facility for our residents can’t be underestimated in terms of the associated health benefits as well as reducing anti-social behaviour and vandalism through the increased use of the park.”