Developer accused of 'wanton destruction' for 'needlessly' felling trees
- Credit: Mark Butler
Residents of a new housing estate are furious with its developer — claiming they chopped down two beautiful trees "completely unnecessarily".
Persimmon has denied the charge levied at it by people living on the White Rose Park development at the former Royal Norwich golf course site in Hellesdon, north Norwich.
The company has already faced criticism for originally planning to fell 149 trees as part of phase two of the 1000-home development, which will see 157 properties added to those built during the first phase.
Mark Butler, 39, moved onto the estate six months ago.
He said he knew some trees would have to be felled for the following phases, but was "shocked and disappointed" to see the two "beautiful trees" at the end of his road chopped down on Wednesday.
He said: "During phase one, those two big trees at the bottom of Oakwood Drive had fences around them with "not to be destroyed" signs.
You may also want to watch:
"So when I saw them being felled on Wednesday, I was furious.
"I checked with Broadland, and it turns out that while Persimmon was denied permission to fell them in phase one, it now has permission to fell them in phase two.
"The tree protection orders were suddenly lifted. It's very sneaky."
- 1 How Norwich are you? Take our quiz to find out
- 2 Tudor Stores reopens as manager resigns over safety fears
- 3 'It's very bad'-Trade decline frustration at stores as roadworks take place
- 4 Police probing reports Norwich clubbers have been spiked by needles
- 5 Teenagers set to be sentenced over stabbing
- 6 Grill van serving gourmet burgers and hot dogs gets residency at city pub
- 7 Chantry Place 'close to finalising deals' with four major brands
- 8 'Such a shame': Social media scammer targets Norwich pub
- 9 'Significant' amount of cash and electronics stolen from city home
- 10 Police investigating ABH after fight off Prince of Wales Road
He added: "What's most aggravating is that they're not even building on that part of land.
"Persimmon say it's to do with surface water run-off, but surely there was another way around this. There's no need for run-off to be directed exactly where these two trees stood.
"It's completely unnecessary."
A Persimmon Homes spokeswoman said the company was striving to retain trees where possible while enabling development of the land for "much needed housing in the area".
She said: "We have been working closely with the local planning and tree officers to retain key high-value trees across the development.
"The two trees were only removed after the local tree officer granted approval.
"We have been working with the local lead flood authority to retain the maximum number of trees possible but also effectively manage site drainage."
Shelagh Gurney, Hellesdon parish councillor and Broadland district councillor, said Persimmon was guilty of "wanton destruction".
"They are felling trees they really don't need to be felling", she said.
"It's causing us great concern.
"I'm not surprised the residents are upset, because Hellesdon councillors are too."