Fine for Norwich ASBO drunk
David BaleAn alcoholic who was banned him from drinking in Norwich city centre because he was intimidating shoppers has been fined after he breached his anti social behaviour order.David Bale
An alcoholic who was banned him from drinking in Norwich city centre because he was intimidating shoppers has been fined after he breached his anti social behaviour order.
Norwich Magistrates' Court heard that David Dignam, 47, was given the ASBO four months ago, after he threatened members of the public while he was drunk in Upper Goat Lane.
But one afternoon earlier this month he was found drunk again in nearby Pottergate, and he admitted breaching the order.
Prosecuting, Lisa Britton said: 'On November 18 last year Dignam was fined for the offence of using threatening behaviour while drunk in a public place and was made subject of an ASBO for two years.
'The terms were that he was prohibited from having alcohol or being drunk in a public place in Norwich city centre.
'Dignam had been identified as a street drinker in the city centre and had intimidated members of the public whilst drunk.
- 1 'Not our fault' - City man hits back on abandoned caravan after land dispute
- 2 From £35k to homeless: Why rough sleepers struggle to get a job
- 3 Burglars smash way into Patisserie Valerie and nab cash
- 4 Boss ordered to build road 15 years ago battles to clear name
- 5 House of horrors: Is this the worst council property in Norwich?
- 6 'I lived in the woods for 20 years': How Sean is starting new life
- 7 Car hits lamppost after two-car crash in Norwich
- 8 'Not worth it!': Councillor wants new bus lane ditched
- 9 Store still cordoned off with police tape two months after break-in
- 10 Has £10,000 prize crash landed in Norwich from space?
'At about 2.50pm on February 4 two PCSOs were in Upper Goat Lane when they saw Dignam, who was stumbling and clearly drunk, with a friend.
'He was losing his balance. They followed him to Pottergate towards the Job Centre, where he slumped to the floor and called one of the officers Hitler.'
In mitigation, Elizabeth Blenkinsop said Dignam, of Sleaford Green, New Catton, Norwich, had not intended to breach the order and had been making a concerted effort to stick to it.
She said: 'He's an alcoholic and has been drinking at home. He apologises profusely for breaching the order.'
Malcolm Bird, chairman of the bench, said: 'Breaching this order is a serious offence. It was originally made to stop you being drunk in a public place and offending members of the public. You must plan ahead, so that if you are drinking at home, you don't go out into a public place.'
Dignam was fined �40 plus a �15 victim surcharge and ordered to pay �20 costs.