Residents objecting to plans to build up to 70 homes on Chapel Lane in Wymondham received the backing of the town council on Tuesday night when councillors unanimously voted against the proposal.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

More than 40 residents attended the town council’s planning, lighting and highways meeting at Fairland Hall to voice their concerns about the plans, which the councillors unanimously voted against, although South Norfolk Council’s planning committee will make the final decision.

Ian McLean, who lives on Chapel Lane, said: “It’s a beautiful, untouched, peaceful environment.

“We are going against this proposal because it’s not right for Wymondham. To keep Wymondham on the map we need something to bring people here.

“It’s not about money – house prices can go up and down – this is about doing what is right for Wymondham.”

The outline application, which has been submitted by the Herts-based Fairfield Partnership, includes plans for up to 70 homes, a play area and public open spaces including new footpaths.

Terry Povey, from the Friends of the Tiffey Valley, described the proposals as a “gross intrusion” into the rural landscape.

“The proposal would result in a housing estate being constructed outside the settlement boundary for Wymondham and close to a country wildlife site and the river floodplain, which it would be likely to adversely affect,” he said. “It would obscure significant and well-loved views of Wymondham Abbey.”

Councillor Andy Gardiner said: “It’s a disgrace to build on the Tiffey Valley – we should preserve as much of Wymondham as we can.

“This development is absolutely wrong and there is no way the council should support it.”

Councillor Jackie Wright said the land was a worldwide treasure and to build on it would mean more cats, dogs and children.

“Let us not destroy it,” she said. “This piece of land is an asset for tourism, leisure and science.”

3 comments

  • one could argue most of these housing developments are "gross intrusion" etc.why was this disallowed? surely "localism" wasn't allowed?

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    bookworm

    Thursday, September 20, 2012

  • i cant believe it--planning refused.in wymondham? i need an explanation.

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    bookworm

    Thursday, September 20, 2012

  • It`s a lovely , unspoiled area , I enjoy walking there . Well done to the local residents .

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    dragonfly

    Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Comments

Welcome , please leave your message below.

Optional - JPG files only
Optional - MP3 files only
Optional - 3GP, AVI, MOV, MPG or WMV files
Comments

Please log in to leave a comment and share your views with other Norwich Evening News visitors.

Forgotten your password?


OR tick the box below to log in using your account with
I have read and accept the terms and conditions

Not a member yet?

Register to create your own unique Norwich Evening News account for free.

Signing up is free, quick and easy and offers you the chance to add comments, personalise the site with local information picked just for you, and more.

Sign up now

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Homes24
Jobs24
Drive24
MyDate24
MyPhotos24
FamilyNotices24
MyMoney24
Weddingsite

loading...

Classifieds, browse or search them online now
Evening News on Twitter
Evening News on Facebook

The Canary magazine
Order your copy of The Canary magazine

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT