Norwich Weather



max temp: 22°C

min temp: 14°C

Anger over cash pot for Norfolk and Suffolk rural authorities

PUBLISHED: 08:00 22 May 2014 | UPDATED: 08:00 22 May 2014

The huge extra cost of transport and sparsity of services is just one of the reasons why campaigners claim local authorities need a better settlement

The huge extra cost of transport and sparsity of services is just one of the reasons why campaigners claim local authorities need a better settlement

Archant Norfolk Photographic © 2010

Extra cash to appease rural funding campaigners has been branded “irrelevant” after some East Anglian council coffers were boosted by just £3,990.

Local government minister Brandon Lewis said in February that the government had listened to concerns about the fairness of the funding announcing a further £2m in grants.

But campaigners have renewed calls for a rethink after Whitehall bosses told East Cambridgeshire it will get £3,990, Breckland will get £11,665, King’s Lynn and West Norfolk will get £11,428, North Norfolk will get £11,945, South Norfolk will get £7,042 and Suffolk Coastal will get £6,126.

The much larger Norfolk County Council will get £98,308, while Suffolk’s county council will be awarded £53,640.

The Rural Services Network, which spearheaded a campaign backed by most rural MPs earlier this year, claims urban councils receive 50pc more per head than rural authorities.

One of those MPs, Mid Norfolk’s George Freeman, said real deprivation in places like Great Yarmouth and Norwich was often disguised by more prosperous parts of the county.

“The historic under-funding through council budget has been made worse in recent years as a result of rising global energy costs where rural families are again hit hardest as we heat our houses and fill our cars.”

Mr Lewis said the government was working on research into the difference in the cost of delivering services between rural and urban areas as the government needed to “get to the bottom of the issue”.

But he dismissed the Rural Services Network figures, claiming the difference between urban and rural authorities was between 13pc and 10pc.

The extra money came on top of a previously announced £9.5m for Rural Services Delivery funding.

Labour candidate for South Norfolk Deborah Sacks said that the amount allocated was not even a token amount.

“It is not even nominal. It is irrelevant in local government terms,” she added.

Do you think the cost of living in the countryside has fallen? Write to: The Letters Editor, EDP, Prospect House, Rouen Road, Norwich NR1 1RE or email

Comment – page 34

Cost of living falls in the countryside – page 8.


Welcome , please leave your message below.

Optional - JPG files only
Optional - MP3 files only
Optional - 3GP, AVI, MOV, MPG or WMV files

Please log in to leave a comment and share your views with other Norwich Evening News visitors.

We enable people to post comments with the aim of encouraging open debate.

Only people who register and sign up to our terms and conditions can post comments. These terms and conditions explain our house rules and legal guidelines.

Comments are not edited by Norwich Evening News staff prior to publication but may be automatically filtered.

If you have a complaint about a comment please contact us by clicking on the Report This Comment button next to the comment.

Not a member yet?

Register to create your own unique Norwich Evening News account for free.

Signing up is free, quick and easy and offers you the chance to add comments, personalise the site with local information picked just for you, and more.

Sign up now

Most Read

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up to receive our regular email newsletter

Most Commented

Show Job Lists