Norwich Weather



max temp: 12°C

min temp: 2°C

People have their say on future of Blakeney’s sea defences

PUBLISHED: 08:58 14 February 2014 | UPDATED: 13:29 14 February 2014

Blakeney after the 2013 tidal flood.

Blakeney after the 2013 tidal flood. PHOTO: ANTONY KELLY

Archant Norfolk 2014

More than 100 concerned villagers gathered at a drop-in event to discuss the future of Blakeney after December’s tidal surge.

The area’s freshwater marshes have been under threat after its flood defences were breached and salt water began contaminating the wildlife habitat.

And with the protective bank breached, the popular coastal walk on its surface has come under threat – leaving villagers worried about the cost to business if holidaymakers stop coming. Yesterday’s event at Blakeney Scout Hut, organised by the Environment Agency, allowed residents to raise concerns.

The key question is whether to allow the sea water to flow in, changing the environmental make-up of the marshes, or to rebuild defences to keep it out – maintaining the freshwater habitat popular with birds and other wildlife.

The Environment Agency has said it is considering the possible options and remains undecided.

Tom Green, 69, of Wilsons Way, Blakeney, said it was important to think of the legacy left for future generations. He said: “There are already plenty of saltwater habitats. It’s important to keep this area for wildlife. Austerity is a short-term problem, but our coast is long-term.”

And mindful of the village’s reliance on tourism for business, many people were concerned about the coastal walk.

Suzy Cowley, 64, who has been living in Blakeney for 30 years, said the path was a vital part of the attraction. She said: “I can see the sense in letting the water rise naturally, but at the same time I can see the impact on this village. Generations of people have been coming here for the marshes and walk, if it disappears they might go elsewhere.” On hand to answer questions at yesterday’s event was the National Trust’s Norfolk coast general manager, John Sizer, who said the trust was undecided about which approach it supported.

He said: “We are open minded about the various options – we have concerns about the whole of the Norfolk coast. But what is clear is that concrete is not the only solution.”

But Paul Hayden, (pictured), chairman of the Regional Flood and Coastal Committee, offered reassurance that Norfolk would secure funds for rebuilding infrastructure.

He said: “We already have the allocation for this year. People and property have to come first.”

And among those representing the Environment Agency at yesterday’s event was Mark Johnson, coastal manager for the EA, who said: “All of the possibilities we are looking at have constraints, but it is vital that we take account of tourism, recreation and the environment, in addition to flood risk when considering them.

“This may take a little longer than is ideal, but we have to avoid implementing a solution that might not work or last.”

Are you still suffering from the effects of the recent floods? Let us know at


  • You have got to wonder weather the money that has been available has be fairly distributed. I mean they can spend £140 Million on the Norfolk Broads, yet can't find £1 Million for this. There something wrong somewhere.

    Report this comment

    John L Norton

    Friday, February 14, 2014

  • Could the cost of repair being quoted have anything to do with trying to prevent repair? The EA, together with Natural England and RSPB, have a long and public stated intention of creating ever more wetlands. It should not cost that much and we should get on and carry out the repairs. IF the EA get away with this one, who has forgotten their proposal to allow the sea to break through as far as Potter Heigham??

    Report this comment


    Friday, February 14, 2014

  • Why have sums of one million been quoted to repair a few collapses in what is basically a sand and gravel mound? Come on now, someone been taken for a ride, get a decent man on a JCB for a week and job done.

    Report this comment


    Friday, February 14, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Most Read

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up to receive our regular email newsletter

Most Commented


Show Job Lists