One man’s battle with officialdom over Catfield Fen
08:30 08 March 2014
Archant Norfolk © 2013
It was a fight he took up six years ago with all the zeal of the boardroom battles he won during an illustrious career at the sharp end of business.
However, Tim Harris, 66, a driving force of P&O for two decades before he engineered a regional success story as chairman of marine services company, the Fisher Group, has found it far tougher to win the battle closest to his heart – the fight to save Catfield Fen.
Since learning in 2008 that the precious wildlife site largely contained on his 400-acre Catfield Hall estate was drying out, he has engaged in endless communication – represented by a table-high stack of files in his front room – with the two government bodies concerned, the Environment Agency (EA) and Natural England (NE).
Despite Mr Harris amassing a formidable bank of evidence from a top UK hydrologist and a world-leading Dutch ecologist pointing to over-abstraction of water being the root of the problem, the EA, responsible for regulating water use, is still deliberating on whether to renew two licences for abstracting water from the fen’s catchment area two years after they became due.
And to his endless frustration, the NE – responsible for protecting landscapes – failed to even meet his experts for several months, citing a lack of resources.
While thoroughly hardened to business battles, he has found it extraordinarily tough to fight opponents who initially would not show up in the ring and then indulged in tactics far outside the Queensberry rules.
“To begin with, the EA would not even respond to me, saying they only talked to groups, not individuals,” he said. “Then something which never happened during my entire business career occurred. I was defamed by the EA and NE in a briefing to then minister Richard Benyon which accused me of making ‘numerous accusations’ and ‘accusations of foul play’.”
Mr Harris, who has since received a written apology for the remarks, said his constituency MP Norman Lamb – who has twice unsuccessfully asked for the abstraction licences renewal decision to be called in – had enjoyed no better luck in obtaining answers from the government bodies.
In a letter to the secretary of state for environment Owen Paterson in October, Mr Lamb said he “wanted to raise my concerns specifically with you – and personally with you as the secretary of state”, but the reply came from junior minister Dan Rogerson.
And the letter did not address Mr Lamb’s concerns over the groundless accusations in the briefing which “will have inevitably tainted the minister’s view and judgement in deciding on the call-in application”.
In a second letter to Mr Paterson sent last month, Mr Lamb writes: “Mr Harris, understandably, is of the opinion that these two organisations (the EA and NE) have contempt for people who challenge their views.
“It is worth reminding you that my constituent appears to have commissioned, entirely at his own expense, the majority of the investigative work and interpretation.
“It is worth noting that the RSPB, supported by the Broads Authority, has now conducted further research which supports my constituent’s views that serious damage is being done to the site.” Mr Lamb also raises the concern that the EA has failed to publish all documents relevant to the case on the dedicated web page it has set up.
Catfield Fen is described by the Environment Agency as the “finest unpolluted valley fen in western Europe” and is covered by the highest national and international conservation designations.
However, highlighting the latest evidence which already shows a reduction in the type of plants associated with wetter fens and a declining trend in water levels, Mr Harris said: “It is hard to repair the damage once it has been done. Unless action is taken quickly there is a danger it will be too late to save the fen.”
And he warned that his battle to save such rare species as swallowtail butterfly, Norfolk hawker dragonfly and fen orchid was one he was fighting for the whole of the Broads, not just Catfield.
“Reedbed habitats are in decline right across Broadland and the ‘elephant in the room’ is increased water abstraction,” he said.
He blamed the change of cropping in East Anglia to plants such as lettuce, sugar beet and potatoes that required more water.
Mr Harris is still awaiting the decision on whether to renew the water abstraction licences but said he would seek judicial review if they are granted, and would take the fight to Brussels if necessary.
He said: “I have spent tens of thousands of pounds so far on experts and legal advice but it will be hundreds of thousands if it goes to court.”
He questioned whether the response of the statutory bodies had been appropriate “to someone raising genuine and well-researched concerns”.
He said: “What hope can there be for normal people if a senior minister like Norman Lamb can get no answer to his repeated questions from Owen Paterson and Defra.
“Can the statutory bodies be trusted to protect the country’s internationally important nature sites, our natural Westminster Abbeys and Canterbury Cathedrals? Our experience at Catfield is far from reassuring.”
A spokesman for the Environment Agency acknowledged the time it was taking to reach a decision on the abstraction licences but said the issues were complex and there was a wealth of information to consider.
She said: “We will be formally consulting Natural England and the Broads Authority at the end of March. They will have four weeks to provide their response. At the same time as we consult with NE and BA we will make publicly available all the documents we have considered as part of our assessment.
“In May, we aim to start a public consultation where we will present our draft decision and ask for comments from interested parties. This public consultation will last for four weeks.”
A spokesman for Natural England said: “We are awaiting the outcome of the Environment Agency’s assessment and will respond to it once published.”
National Farmers’ Union water resources specialist Paul Hammett said: “The Broads is a unique eco system and the farmers who live and work there recognise their responsibilities to manage the countryside and protect the environment, as well as working to meet growing demand for quality British food.
“The abstraction of water from rivers and underground aquifers is essential for growing food such as potatoes, onions and carrots, but even in an agriculturally dominant county like Norfolk, the vast majority of water is taken, not by farmers, but for public supply.
“The small percentage of water abstracted for agricultural use is closely regulated by the Environment Agency, whose first duty is to protect the environment.
“It would have stopped abstraction at Catfield Fen if there was clear evidence it was causing a problem. “Catfield Fen is undoubtedly a very important conservation site, which is why the agency continues to take a precautionary approach.
“Let’s hope common sense prevails so that farmers surrounding Catfield Fen and throughout Norfolk can, through a carefully regulated licensing system, have a secure supply of water to grow our food.” What do you think? Write, giving full contact details, to the Letters Editor, Prospect House, Rouen Road, Norwich, NR1 1RE.