Is part of Norfolk’s coastline about to be abandoned to the sea?

Flood damage. The A149 through Salthouse totally covered with sea water.
PHOTO: ANTONY KELLY Flood damage. The A149 through Salthouse totally covered with sea water. PHOTO: ANTONY KELLY

Thursday, January 23, 2014
2:33 PM

Parts of north Norfolk’s coastline could be permanently sacrificed to the sea following the tidal surges which battered the East Coast last month.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

Flood damage. A resident at Salthouse tries to clear the water from her house.
PHOTO: ANTONY KELLYFlood damage. A resident at Salthouse tries to clear the water from her house. PHOTO: ANTONY KELLY

The Environment Agency boss revealed yesterday that he is weighing up whether to reinstate flood defences in Brancaster, Blakeney and Salthouse, after they were breached last month.

Paul Leinster, who was hauled before a committee of MPs 
following the prolonged winter floods, said his agency is questioning whether or not to try to re-establish freshwater habitats, or let the sea water through permanently.

Some conservationists claim it would be a disaster to lose the freshwater environment, where birds which flock each year to breed attract thousands of tourists.

Richard Porter, a professional ornithologist and conservationist from Cley, said: “I think leaving things and letting nature take its course, from a bird conservation point of view and for the conservation of other wildlife, would not be very sensible.”

The areas

BLAKENEY

Blakeney nature reserve features a unique mix of salt marsh, mudflats and freshwater marsh nestling around the area’s famous spit.

The differing habitats host their own diverse range of special wildlife.

Blakeney Point, within the reserve, is a four-mile-long sand and shingle spit.

Sand dunes have formed over hundreds of years on the shingle ridge and provide a rare habitat valuable for unusual plants, insects, birds and seals.

The area is an internationally-important breeding area for seabirds, and home to a colony of common and grey seals.

The National Trust says: “The saltmarsh, mudflats, sand dunes and shingle ridge are all in a constant state of flux, adapting to the forces of nature shaping this ever changing coastline.”

The sea surge caused major damage in the area including to infrastructure used by visitors. Boardwalks, buildings and bridges are undergoing repairs, and the Lifeboat House and toilet facilities on Blakeney Point are closed until April.

Seal trip ferry boats are running as normal from Morston Quay.

BRANCASTER

The Scolt Head Island National Nature Reserve, near Brancaster, is home to saltmarshes considered to be among the finest in the UK.

The island supports nationally and internationally important numbers of breeding terns (sandwich, common, arctic and little) and wintering wildfowl, and waders such as Brent geese, shelduck, wigeon, teal and curlew.

The plant communities of the dunes and saltmarshes are classic examples of their type.

Vegetated shingle “lows” contain plant species of national importance such as matted sea lavender and sea heath.

The reserve covers an area of some 727 hectares of sand dune, beach and saltmarsh, which is owned jointly by the National Trust and Norfolk Wildlife Trust, and has been a nature reserve since 1923. It is managed by Natural England.

Brancaster is also home to the National Trust-owned Brancaster Activity Centre, which was hit by the floods on December 5.

The toilets at Brancaster beach were also badly damaged by the tidal flooding and are expected to remain closed to all visitors until April during refurbishment works.

CLEY MARSHES

Cley Marshes between Cley and Salthouse is Norfolk Wildlife Trust’s (NWT) oldest and best known nature reserve.

It was purchased in 1926 by Dr Sydney Long, founder of NWT, making it the first wildlife trust reserve in the country.

It is one of Britain’s best nature reserves for bird watching because the many pools and scrapes attract thousands of birds.

The site is unusual because of its variety of habitats on the saltwater and freshwater marshes.

Scrape pools are used widely by breeding and migratory birds.

The shingle bank is home to unusual plants including the yellow-horned poppy.

The shingle beach and saline lagoons, along with the grazing marsh and reedbed, support large numbers of wintering and migrating wildfowl and waders as well as bittern, marsh harrier and bearded tit.

During the spring the pools fill with wading birds including the spotted redshank on their way to Arctic breeding grounds. Sedge, reed and grasshopper warblers can be seen in the reedbeds. The Cley Marshes is one of only a handful of sites in Britain with breeding bittern at this time of year.

Birds including the white and black-feathered avocet breed on the marshes in the summer. Throughout August and September waders return to the site and feed on insects and worms in the pools before continuing their southward journey.

As winter approaches large numbers of wildfowl including wigeon, teal, shoveler, and pintail gather. The shingle bank is popular with flocks of goldfinch or linnet during this time.

The new Cley Marshes Visitors Centre opened in summer 2007.

A spokesman for the RSPB said: “The storms have had damaging effects for local people, wildlife and nature reserves along the Norfolk and Suffolk coastline. Sadly, as climate change predicts sea levels to rise, these types of events will become much more severe in future years.

“We need to plan to minimise these impacts, but there also lies an opportunity to work with natural processes to create sustainable defences and new wildlife habitats.

“The creation of new salt marshes and nature reserves can work with natural processes, absorbing large volumes of water as well as bearing the brunt of the tidal surges. They also have the advantage of being able to adapt to sea level rise and are comparatively cheap.

“We will all need to work together to consider the options and it will be fundamental to recognise the vital role nature can play in protecting our coastline and the people who live there.

“Where freshwater habitats may be lost to future storm surge events, the RSPB, along with others, is stepping up its efforts to create new freshwater nature reserves inland to ensure the wildlife dependent on habitats like these is not lost forever.”

The Environment Agency has employed an independent consultant to explore all options available. The organisation will receive the report next month and will discuss it with partners and those affected when considering their options for the North Norfolk coast.

They could not provide further details last night of the exact areas which could be under threat.

Mark Johnson, coastal manager for the Environment Agency, said: “Last month’s combination of strong winds, large waves and high tides led to a record tidal surge along many parts of the coast.

“This had a large impact on areas along the north Norfolk coast that needs thorough evaluation before any decisions are made. We have already employed Halcrow as consultants to review the situation in Brancaster, Blakeney and Salthouse.

“We are expecting their report next month. The report and discussions with our partners and those affected will help us to consider our options for the north Norfolk coast.”

Mr Leinster told the committee that some flood defences were still under water, but went on to say: “In other places we will have discussions with Natural England and others as to whether we are going to reinstate those flood defences, or whether we will allow the water that has now broken through to remain.”

He added: “The question has to be, do we reinstate those defences and then allow freshwater habitat to re-establish, or allow inter-tidal habitat to establish?”

He added that he wanted to assure the committee that property and people were being protected, and the Environment Agency had carried out all the temporary work needed.

John Sizer, general manager for the National Trust in north Norfolk, which looks after beauty spots from Brancaster to Blakeney, said: “We’re in fairly regular contact with Natural England and the Environment Agency about the strategic direction they’re [taking] and also [have] some very specific questions and concerns that we’re putting to them.”

Chris Starkie, managing director of the New Anglia Local Enterprise Partnership, said: “We will be seeking urgent clarification from the Environment Agency regarding the reinstatement of flood defences to understand their plans and to seek reassurances that any proposals will take into account the impact on the coastal economy.”

David Thompson, head of Visit North Norfolk, said he could sympathise with the EA’s stance over leaving the breaches, but 
equally had concerns if it was to cause major environmental impact and thought a balance needed to be struck.

Denise Burke, Labour’s parliamentary candidate for North Norfolk, said: “This is outrageous. The residents of Blakeney, Salthouse and nearby will rightly be very worried – and where will be next?

“We expect all the defences damaged by the recent tidal surge to be not just reinstated but also improved.”

19 comments

  • Exactly where is the "front line"against the sea going to be? Will they do the same to Walsingham,Fakenham or Holt?There needs to be a"red line in the sand" somewhere-if the sand hasn't disappeared as well.

    Report this comment

    Peter Watson

    Thursday, January 23, 2014

  • no comment from norman lamb on how this is nothing to do with him or his government ? perhaps he is basking in the glory of the edp comparison to tory leader john major!!

    Report this comment

    Double Bill

    Thursday, January 23, 2014

  • Funny how, when this happens abroad Cameron is always first with the cheque book, but when it happens in this country they couldnt give a stuff. Time the Environment Agency realised that they work for us, not the other way round.

    Report this comment

    "V"

    Thursday, January 23, 2014

  • There is no argument that loss of habitat will be bad for the county if defences are not reinstated, nor that the loss of footpaths, landscape and features will impact tourism. The argument is WHO WILL PAY. There is no blank cheque to reinstate or improve defences. The environment agency are having funding CUT! Get real if you think it's all going to go back to normal, or that it is the fault of the environment agency if it does not happen. If the wildlife groups and national trust feel its such a loss, why don't they pay for the reinstatement! People and property are what matters to the government, not birds and bees and they are not long sighted enough to see the tourism losses in the future

    Report this comment

    JK

    Thursday, January 23, 2014

  • What Denise Burke really meant was 'it's the general election next year, I need as many votes as I can muster therefore I will take every opportunity to appear as though I am on the side of my potential constituents even though my knowledge of coastal processes is shakey at best'.

    Report this comment

    Betty Swallocks

    Thursday, January 23, 2014

  • It's pretty obvious government cuts to finding flood protection would mean less defence. Unfortunately you many swallow the government spin that we will still be better off even with cuts.

    Report this comment

    Jeffrey Osborne

    Thursday, January 23, 2014

  • Blakeney will be protected. After all its the home of the ROYAL Blakeney Golf Club. What would happen when Prince Andrew fancied a game?

    Report this comment

    outsider

    Thursday, January 23, 2014

  • This is what selling dredged land to Holland for 365 day a year has done to the coastline, thanks Crown estate.

    Report this comment

    ingo wagenknecht

    Thursday, January 23, 2014

  • Don't forget it was not all that long ago that there was a proposal to abandon pretty much all the defences along the Norfolk coast and let the sea encroach as far as Potter Heigham. The 'consideration' now being given could be no more than an opportunistic start to that process. The government has cut back flood defence expenditure from £800m pa to £600m. I think that the matter of Salthouse is quite different from Blakeney and Cley. The former has always suffered from the shingle bank being breached and it has always been reinstated to protect the coast road. This work should continue - it does not cost that much and building an alternative road would cost much more. Not sure what the problem has been at Blakeney and Cley but in the case of the latter we again need to protect the coast road.

    Report this comment

    andy

    Thursday, January 23, 2014

  • There is little point in consulting with Natural England on these points. They have already shown their position e.g. at Easton Bavents when Mr Boggis tried to protect the cliffs from erosion. Natural England who are supposed to look after SSSIs or at least not be detrimental to them, said that the EB Cliffs, which are a SSSI, are best protected by letting them erode into the sea, totally illogical imo! Of course these or any defences can be repaired, extended over time or whatever a coherent vision for the future requires. It is not rocket science by any means. It just needs sensible forethought.

    Report this comment

    Dave01

    Thursday, January 23, 2014

  • Too many, that should say.

    Report this comment

    Jeffrey Osborne

    Thursday, January 23, 2014

  • Makes sense to me, so long as properties and the coast road are adequately protected-never quite seen the sense of creating or increasing artificial fresh water habitats on the basis that some of the lagoons which were a result of coastal defence creation had become fresh water. Attracting freshwater species to an isolated environment vulnerable to salt water incursion just to get bums on hide seats seems rather irresponsible.

    Report this comment

    Daisy Roots

    Thursday, January 23, 2014

  • I object to Government wasting my tax money on people living on the coast. Let them buy their own flood defences.

    Report this comment

    Cyril the Canary

    Friday, January 24, 2014

  • If we let bits go now, there will be more bits next year, and more the year after....and so on. It is the duty of government to protect our coastline.

    Report this comment

    The man on the Clapham Omnibus

    Thursday, January 23, 2014

  • Cromer ,Sheringham and so on will become peninsulars sticking out from the coastline eventually if nothing is done !

    Report this comment

    Albert Cooper

    Thursday, January 23, 2014

  • I would have to look at reference books Ingo but at least part of the coast line referred to could be an accreting coast rather than an eroding coast-which coud be why the beach is now some way from Cley and Blakeney villages and there is salt marsh when in the past the villages were ports and contributed small ships to the national security . I agree that a lack of forward line could make some places more vulnerable, but then again who is to say the banks might not recover naturally. As for gravel extraction, the Crown Estate = the government, which has controlled it for donkeys years and takes the revenue. If the BGS is not overworried about the relative quantities extracted I dont see why we should be, especially when some of the data used to claim erosion on our coast is caused by extraction actually refers to areas off the USA . Some of the claims about the wildlife are off the mark-the bittern hangs around the broads, many of the waders feed in brackish pools and on places like Breydon which is salt, and the little brown job migrants would find places to roost in the gorse bushes and other places in land. There is no reason why the salt marsh environment should not be as valuable as the created fresh water environment

    Report this comment

    Daisy Roots

    Thursday, January 23, 2014

  • And I thought Easton Bavents cliffs are an SSSI because it is where fossils are exposed-if the deposits go back inland some way there is no problem, perhaps even some interest in a new exposure.

    Report this comment

    Daisy Roots

    Thursday, January 23, 2014

  • Won't that lady just raise the sea level by emptying her buckets of water into the sea?

    Report this comment

    Rhombus

    Thursday, January 23, 2014

  • The lazy option? Daisy, if these properties are going to be protected, a big permissive 'if'. Once the sea has taken foot and washed its path, we will not be bale to protect other area from a stormsurge.

    Report this comment

    ingo wagenknecht

    Thursday, January 23, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Homes24
Jobs24
Drive24
LocalSearch24
MyDate24
MyPhotos24
FamilyNotices24
Weddingsite

loading...

Classifieds, browse or search them online now

The Canary magazine
Order your copy of The Canary magazine

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT