The collapse of Fountains Group is the second major blow suffered by workers employed by a Norwich City Council contractor in little over a year.

To send a link to this page to a friend, simply enter their email address below.

The message will include the name and email address you gave us when you signed up.

 

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

In April 2010, Norwich City Council awarded eight contracts to Connaught after the break-up of the CityCare contract.

The old CityCare contract had been plagued with controversy, with the Evening News revealing how 17,000 tenants and leaseholders had been charged over the odds for building and maintenance work on their homes.

After CityCare’s 10-year contract came to an end, the city council chose Exeter-based Connaught to take on responsibility for services ranging from fixing and repairing the city’s council homes to managing asbestos and recycling. The various parts of the contract added up to £125m in total, but eyebrows were raised that the amount Connaught said the contracts could be delivered for was so much lower than other bidders.

The city council also had to reach a financial settlement with Morrison, the parent company of CityCare, after it challenged the decision to award Connaught the £17.5m a year contract for housing maintenance in the High Court.

At the High Court hearing Mr Justice Arnold said Morrison had a “seriously arguable” case that Connaught’s bid for the housing maintenance contract was “abnormally low” and that the council had not properly investigated it.

There were problems with Connaught from the start, including missed appointments and workers not being fully paid, which were initially blamed on teething troubles.

However, Connaught’s share price tumbled and a profit warning was issued, before, in September last year, Connaught Partnerships went into administration, leading to the loss of 300 jobs. Connaught Environmental, which at that time employed 200 people, was saved by administrators KPMG and was rebranded as Fountains.

But the company, which also had council contracts with the London Boroughs of Wandsworth, Camden, Hillingdon and Tower Hamlets, continued to have problems.

It was taken over in March last year, in a move which bosses hailed at the time as securing its long-term future.

However, unfortunately for the Norwich workers, that turned out not to be the case.

While much of Fountain Group’s assets and contracts have been sold, securing more than 1,500 jobs, the Norwich contract is not among them.

That leaves the city council trying to find a way to provide services and the workers hoping their skills will be required by whichever company takes over the contracts.

Latest News

4 comments

  • Biffa, the other contractor is also being eyed for a takeover, according to Sky News business page. If that was to happen,one can only assume that the new buyer wouldn't want Fountains binmen transferred either, concluding the full domino effect of which once was City Care and it's workforce. nuLabour isn't working....lengthening dole queues are.

    Report this comment

    nrg

    Tuesday, January 24, 2012

  • The problem with split contracts is if there is a major job to be done , then it is a logistical nightmaire getting all trades persons on site at the same time. I had that problem when walls needed replastering. Had to wait for plumbers to remove radiators and pipework, then wait for plasterers who then had to say we cannot continue until a gas engineer could disconnect and remove the gas supply, this is for one flat imagine that scenario for the Mile Cross Tower block damaged by fire.

    Report this comment

    chebram71

    Tuesday, January 24, 2012

  • Most of the work can be split up into much smaller contracts that are subsequently issued to small local firms. This will minimise the impact if a firm runs into trouble and (although i'm sure the council is against this) help the local economy.

    Report this comment

    Sauber

    Tuesday, January 24, 2012

  • Well this should be a valuable lesson to those in charge at Norwich City Council not to go for the cheapest bid knowing that services couldn't be delivered. Also the fact that by choosing the cheapest bid would result in a legal challenge, so how was this of benefit to the tax payer? When the next local elections come along, do not vote Labour then then the muppets who made the initial poor decisions will be out on their ear, plenty good enough in my opinion :)

    Report this comment

    chebram71

    Tuesday, January 24, 2012



Homes24
Jobs24
Drive24
MyDate24
MyPhotos24
FamilyNotices24
MyMoney24MyVouchers24

Classifieds, browse or search them online now
Evening News on Twitter
Evening News on Facebook