British Prime Minister David Cameron
Monday, March 18, 2013
3:24 PM
Until The Norwich Evening News started investigating serious failings at this region’s ambulance service, little was known about a crisis that, ultimately, poses a threat to lives.
A deal has been done to create a tough new press regulator, Harriet Harman said today.
The shadow culture secretary said a charter would be published this morning and would be put to MPs this afternoon.
Peers will then be asked to agree to a “small piece of legislation” which would effectively prevent the charter being watered down.
Ms Harman said the legislation to go before peers specifically would not mention press regulation.
She told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: “We have to publish the charter this morning, we have to this afternoon put it before the House of Commons.
“In the House of Lords I hope they are going to agree to a bit of law that says this charter can’t be tampered with by ministers.
“I hope there won’t be a vote in the House of Lords because I hope it will be agreed.
“There’s an amendment going forward into the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill which says that where a charter says in that charter it can’t be dissolved or amended without a two-thirds majority in both Houses then that should have the force of law.”
She added: “It specifically won’t mention this charter because the idea is that we want to have that effect without it actually mentioning press regulation in law.”
No press releases had been forthcoming, no special briefings given. Our MPs were largely unaware of the scale of difficulties – that 999 vehicles have not been reaching stricken patients in the time they should. This issue is a major one in a largely rural area – time to scene is vital in accidents, in stroke and heart cases and in many other medical emergencies. Doggedly, we have uncovered a dreadful situation and we have attended one harrowing inquest when the ambulance service’s response and actions at roadside were called in to question. Today, in London, MPs will vote to underpin proposals made by Lord Leveson in his inquiry into Press standards by imposing statute.
A law which, many editors and commentators believe, is the first link of chain aimed at shackling and suffocating both Britain’s national and regional Press.
Today, editors and media commentators up and down the country will urge rejection of this draconian move – whilst welcoming and supporting all the good in these Press reform proposals.
Never again phone hacking by sections of the tabloid press and other despicable actions which, in any case, are covered by civil and criminal law.
But never, ever, a day when honourable journalists can’t investigate on behalf of ordinary folk – often against the mighty – in cases which affect villages, towns and cities up and down Britain.
Just imagine a day when another government, at another time, decided that NHS reforms shouldn’t be scrutinised at all.
Or that papers like the Evening News shouldn’t be able to investigate our 999 service. Or hugely controversial proposals affecting mental health services here.
Or that investigations into MPs expenses were out of bounds?
Today we’re hoping all the good of Leveson will be enshrined in a proposed Royal Charter – and that our country’s newly-reformed Press should be given the chance to show it has changed course for good.
Today’s events will be played out at Westminster but the ramifications of them could well be felt from Yarmouth to Wisbech, Blakeney to Buckenham, and Norwich to Lowestoft.
We’ll tell you how our MPs voted –we’re so glad we can.
-
Culture secretary Maria Miller was last night hoping a cross-party deal on press regulation could still be struck ahead of a crunch Commons vote.
MPs are due to decide today on the shape of a new watchdog system to meet the demands of the Leveson Report into phone-hacking and other abuses.
Labour and the Liberal Democrats have joined forces to propose a regulator set up by royal charter and underpinned by legislation. The Conservatives also propose a royal charter but Mrs Miller said any move to back it in statute could have a “chilling effect” on free speech.
But with prime minister David Cameron facing likely defeat in the Commons after pulling the plug on cross-party talks, there were signs there could yet be compromise.
“I hope that the discussions that we have over the next 24 hours can really make sure that we can come together and have a real solution here,” Mrs Miller said.
“We can have tough self-regulation of the press with million pound fines, prominent apologies, without having the potentially chilling effect that statutory underpinning would bring.”
She spoke after chancellor George Osborne, pictured, also indicated a desire for agreement, saying: “There is still an opportunity for us to get together and get a press law that works.”
Political disagreement over the solution was a recipe for regulation that would not last or become “deeply-rooted in our culture”, he said.
Mr Cameron – who has said he will stand by the vote – said on Saturday he did not consider the Lib/Lab proposed statutory underpinning “a big issue of principle”. Labour said it had not had any approach for fresh talks, however, and would remain “resolute” in pushing for tough controls tomorrow to protect victims of press intrusion.
Shadow culture secretary Harriet Harman said the party had “always said we would like to reach agreement” which could be brought to the Commons as a united position. “There are just a few issues that remain between us, but they are quite important ones,” she added.
With up to 20 Tories reportedly ready to back the Lib/Lab pact, allies of Mr Cameron accept he will be hard-pressed to win the Commons vote despite intense efforts to shore up support.
Former Tory minister Lord Fowler encouraged the party’s MPs to rebel as the Lib/Lab plan “comes closest to implementing Lord Justice Leveson’s careful and objective report”.
Mr Cameron insists he is acting as “a friend of the victims” of phone hacking, but one of them, author JK Rowling, said they had been “hung out to dry” by the prime minister.
“I am merely one among many turning their eyes towards Ed Miliband and Nick Clegg and hoping they have the courage to do what Cameron promised, but which he failed to deliver,” she said.
Mr Miliband urged MPs to do their “duty” by her and others such as the parents of murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler and disappeared Madeleine McCann.
“We are at this moment which is a sort of crossroads: do we change or is it more of the same? We need to choose the right course, and I think it is a test of politics,” he said.
Actor Hugh Grant, who fronts the Hacked Off campaign, said the royal charter plan was not “ideal” but said victims supported it and urged Tory MPs to defy Mr Cameron. “MPs promised to do right by them and they have that chance on Monday,” he added.
ADVERTISEMENT
4 comments
if only the press would post both sides of the story and less face it archant titles are some of the worst for being biased. never reporting on things which happen at archant? Archant does not due free press and nrver will
Report this comment
woody
Monday, March 18, 2013
Our local press never stir things up, most stories that are worth being hard nosed and investigated are done by the big press boys.
Report this comment
nrg
Monday, March 18, 2013
Alas the press have bought it on themselves. Trashy stories, tittle tattle, non news solacious rubbish as well as hacking, snooping and libel. The press (local included) have produced and still produce tut. That is why this is happening and that is one of the reasons why papers are a dying business. For years apologies and retraction have been hidden away unfair short pieces despite the story which could have been front page.
Report this comment
NchNthMan
Monday, March 18, 2013
reports like this just demonstrate why we do need some sort of regulation. there is nothing in the proposed legislation that would stop you or anyone else reporting on any subject you choose to and any kind of political interference is prevented by the legislation. Scare tactics by the press are disgusting, all you care about is promoting your own self serving agenda with out a care for the peoples lives you destroy. Anyone is entitled to have an opinion but it should be the truth and knowing that there is some redress when you get it wrong should only encourage you to get your facts straight before you publish.
Report this comment
eggy12
Monday, March 18, 2013