Calls have been made to put an immediate stop to the job threat to Environment Agency staff involved in the East Coast floods.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

Union bosses are writing to new environment secretary Elizabeth Truss to halt plans to axe 350 jobs at the agency charged with protecting us from future flooding.

Staff in the East face an uncertain future after a consultation was launched to give the agency an overhaul and reduce the workforce to 10,250 by October. Jason Bowden, from the GMB Union, called for Ms Truss to march to Downing Street to call for the Treasury to restore agency funding to an “adequate level”.

The agency says that it is putting in an “affordable structure” which will not affect its ability to respond to incidents, including flooding.

But union bosses said the job cuts would have an impact as there were very few “back room staff” who were not involved in flood protection, maintenance and the immediate response to floods. Mr Bowden said: “They may not be in the so-called front line of defence, but the agency isn’t packed full of people counting rare crested newts. There are some, but most people are out there in a flood or drought-related function.”

The Environment Agency has refused to provide details of which jobs are not part of the consultation which started on June 30 and lasts for three weeks. Regional teams have been axed, so all staff will either report to an area or national team.

In a statement, the Environment Agency said: “The additional £140m for Flood and Coastal Risk Management given to us in the Budget means we have not reduced the number of flood frontline posts.

“Like all other public sector organisations, we are facing a future with reduced funding and, while reductions will not be as high as previously thought, by October 2014, it is likely our job numbers will be around 10,250.

“Going into the new financial year our staff numbers were around 10,600.

“We are consulting with staff on proposed changes to our organisational structure. It is our aim to minimise compulsory redundancies and we have sought to do this through a voluntary early release scheme and, where appropriate, not backfilling posts when someone leaves.”

Are you concerned about job losses at the Environment Agency? Email

Comment – page 32.


  • The Environment agency was bloated with useless staff appointed during Labour's regime. Labour let the environment Agency go to pot, they let it lean towards neglect excused with concern for the environment, spending on letting land flood for birds rather than flood defences etc. If they keep the engineers and sack the wet hens it will be fine. And Hemsby had erosion not flooding. And sea defences take several years to plan.

    Add your comment | Report this comment

    Daisy Roots

    Friday, July 18, 2014

  • you only get what you vote for

    Add your comment | Report this comment


    Friday, July 18, 2014

  • " halt plans to axe 350 jobs at the agency charged with protecting us from future flooding." They havent done a very good job up to now, have they ?. Scrapping the sirens, no dredging. No wonder there is flooding.

    Add your comment | Report this comment


    Friday, July 18, 2014

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site





Classifieds, browse or search them online now

The Canary magazine
Order your copy of The Canary magazine