Decision on proposed facelift to Norwich’s Castle Mall deferred

Castle Mall artists impression Nov 2013. Castle Mall artists impression Nov 2013.

Thursday, December 5, 2013
11:53 AM

Developers said retailers had been put off moving to Norwich’s Castle Mall because of its current state, after a decision on a proposed facelift for one of the entrances was deferred by city councillors today.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

A new application submitted by the centre’s owners, Infrared UK, was discussed by Norwich City Council’s planning committee, after a previous application was rejected.

And while the new proposal met with more success councillors were still reluctant to approve the plans, and voted, by eight to two, to defer the application to allow planning officers to meet the applicant again to draw up a solution that was acceptable to both.

After the meeting, Rob Cossey, from the Hark Group, which is the asset manager for Castle Mall, said he was disappointed at the decision.

He said: “It’s not a helpful result. The scheme for the new entrance is massively better than the existing one.

“We will now have to speak to the planning officers, but it leaves us in limbo. We have had retailers walk away from Castle Mall, because it lacks prominence.

“Bold cities have bold architects, and Castle Mall should not be trapped in the past. We should have made this investment into Castle Mall six to nine months ago.”

Michael Innes, the Castle Mall’s original architect, however, said after the meeting that the new design was inappropriate.

He said: “It will wear very quickly. It’s a fashionable gesture that will look very tired in two years’ time.”

At the meeting, Chris Huxtable, from Infrared UK, said Castle Mall needed investment to ensure that Norwich kept its position in the top 10 in the UK as a retail destination.

He said: “We are proposing to spend £5m at the mall over the next two years. The entrance is well past its sell by date, and it needs and deserves a new face.”

But city councillor Ralph Gayton proposed that a decision should be deferred, and said: “Elements of this proposal are eminently successful. We should ask the two parties to get together, sort this out amicably, and come back with a proposal that is acceptable to both sides.”

Fellow councillor Stephen Little, however, said he liked the new design, which he said was “brave and innovative.

“Sometimes we need to be modern and a bit brave in our architecture”, he said.

Councillor Paul Neale agreed, adding: “This fits the bill in my mind.”

However, city councillor Lesley Grahame said the new design included a “monstrosity” on top, and Sue Sands likened it to a “giant cheesegrater”.

The new design includes a patterned aluminium façade, designed like a shawl to reflect the city’s textile heritage.

Officers at the city council recommended the planning committee turn down the proposal. They said that the new entrance would be a “discordant” feature, which would change and dilute the existing architectural character of the centre, which is home to 850 jobs.

But centre manager Paul McCarthy wrote to officers and councillors urging them to support it. He said an exhibition about the plans in Castle Mall was viewed by 524 people and of those who responded, 97pc said they supported the changes.

The changes also had support from the Norwich Business Improvement District, Norfolk Chamber of Commerce and Mark Skelton, manager of the Boots store and chairman of the Tenants Association.

What’s your view? Leave us a comment below.

7 comments

  • I agree with Michael Innes, the original architect, that these proposals will age badly. What if someone had proposed an Art Deco facelift to the Royal Arcade in the 1930's? Leave well alone and concentrate on making the interior attractive.

    Report this comment

    Rich Hartt

    Thursday, December 5, 2013

  • Cllr Little said “Sometimes we need to be modern and a bit brave in our architecture” - isn't that what the vast majority of Councillors, architects and town planners said in the 1960s?! Architects rarely care about areas. They design things out-of-the-ordinary so as to stand out and make a name for themselves. Period.

    Report this comment

    robert quade

    Thursday, December 5, 2013

  • As if retailers have been put off by the building's exterior. What a ridiculous statement.

    Report this comment

    DT

    Thursday, December 5, 2013

  • Oi V that is my saying lol

    Report this comment

    che bramley

    Thursday, December 5, 2013

  • "We have had retailers walk away from Castle Mall, because it lacks prominence" It's in the middle of Norwich, not out on the outer ring road. I should think retailers were put off more by the general ageing of the interior. Going round with a tin of paint wouldn't hurt. The other thing to do would be to advertise the Mall, something which its rival "intu Chapelfield" does.

    Report this comment

    G_of_Norwich

    Thursday, December 5, 2013

  • Obviously not enough in the brown envelopes

    Report this comment

    "V"

    Thursday, December 5, 2013

  • “It’s not a helpful result. The scheme for the new entrance is massively better than the existing one." NO ITS NOT! Thats the point, I've not seen or heard of a single person who liked that artists impression. Back to the drawing board Mr Cossey.

    Report this comment

    Piranha24

    Thursday, December 5, 2013

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Homes24
Jobs24
Drive24
MyDate24
MyPhotos24
FamilyNotices24
Weddingsite

loading...

Classifieds, browse or search them online now

The Canary magazine
Order your copy of The Canary magazine

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT