Councillors have defied planning officers by turning down a scheme to build four houses on the former bowling green of a nearby pub.

Norwich Evening News: Flashback to 2015, when the bowling green was in use. Picture: DENISE BRADLEYFlashback to 2015, when the bowling green was in use. Picture: DENISE BRADLEY (Image: Archant)

Applicants Hines, Moore and Piggin had sought permission to redevelop land at the back of the Heath House pub on Gertrude Road in Norwich.

But members of Norwich City Council's planning committee voted 7-4 against the scheme on Thursday, expressing concern about the loss of open space.

The decision has been welcomed by people living nearby, who are now looking at ways to ensure the land is retained for the community.

Speaking after the meeting, Tony Moore, who represented residents on Violet Road, said: 'The idea of putting family homes so near to a public house is so misguided. We really welcome the refusal today.

'There is huge potential for building a community garden in Gertrude Road, and we are now looking at corporate sponsorship to achieve that.'

He said the garden could be used by people wanting to grow plants and vegetables, as well as those who lack a lawn of their own.

The application had been recommended for approval by council officers, who said the bowling green had not been used for around two years.

Case officer Robert Webb stated that the applicant would also be contributing £15,000 to the council to compensate for the green's loss.

He said the money would be used to upgrade the pitch and putt course at Mousehold Heath.

But committee member and Green Party councillor Denise Carlo said: 'Designated open space is a very precious resource and once it is lost, it is lost for good. The financial contribution has a short-lived benefit.'

Labour councillor Hugo Malik said he felt 'uncomfortable' about the plans, adding: 'In two years time, these [new] residents will be complaining about noise from the pub.'

Case officer Mr Webb warned that should the applicant appeal the decision, a planning inspector would look at whether the loss of the green had been mitigated, adding: 'We believe it has.'

He claimed there had not been 'demand' for the bowling green and that there were other facilities elsewhere in the city.

Is an open space near you under threat? Call Luke Powell on 01603 772684